首页> 外文OA文献 >We Need Tighter Regulatory Standards for Blood Glucose Monitoring, But They Should Be for Accuracy Disclosure
【2h】

We Need Tighter Regulatory Standards for Blood Glucose Monitoring, But They Should Be for Accuracy Disclosure

机译:我们需要更严格的血糖监测监管标准,但这些标准应该用于准确性披露

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regulatory interest has focused on the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems. Currently, almost all systems meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197 clinical standard (≥95% of the values within 20% of the reference for values above 75 mg/dl and within 15 mg/dl below that level). Should the systems have to meet one of the extended ISO standards of 15%, 10%, or even 5%? There is a wide variety of people with diabetes doing glucose monitoring, and the majority do not need better accuracy. Indeed, when selecting an insulin dose, the inaccuracy of the glucose reading has little effect compared with the inaccuracy in counting carbohydrates and the variability in insulin absorption. It might be far better to evaluate the accuracy in a standard method and provide the accuracy values on a standard label. Patients and health care providers could then select the monitoring system that best meets their needs.
机译:监管兴趣集中在血糖监测系统的准确性上。当前,几乎所有系统都符合国际标准化组织(ISO)15197的临床标准(对于高于75 mg / dl的值和低于该水平15 mg / dl的值,≥95%的值在参考值的20%以内)。系统是否必须满足15%,10%甚至5%的扩展ISO标准之一?糖尿病患者的血糖监测方法多种多样,大多数患者不需要更高的准确性。的确,当选择胰岛素剂量时,与计算碳水化合物和胰岛素吸收变化的准确性相比,葡萄糖读数的准确性几乎没有影响。用标准方法评估准确性并在标准标签上提供准确性值可能要好得多。然后,患者和医疗保健提供者可以选择最能满足其需求的监控系统。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ginsberg, Barry H;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号